![]() |
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY |
6/28/2001 |
|
MEMORANDUM FOR : THE SECURITY ASSISTANCE COMMUNITY SUBJECT : Security Assistance Administrative Trust Fund (T-20) Budget Policy Handbook for Security Assistance Organizations (SAOs) (DSCA 01-19) The Security Assistance Administrative Trust Fund (T-20) Budget Policy Handbook for SAOs (attachment) is a comprehensive guide to the SAO budget preparation and financial execution processes. It incorporates and supplements policy and procedures contained in DoD 5105.38-M, Security Assistance Management Manual (SAMM), and other Department of Defense, joint, Military Department, and Unified Command references. This Handbook provides the Unified Command, the SAO Chief and the SAO Budget Officer a compilation of policies, concepts, definitions and procedures relevant to the management of the T-20 funds used to support SAO operations. The information contained herein is DSCA policy for the management of T-20 funds. In the event of conflicting guidance, the SAO should consult with its Unified Command Comptroller to ascertain the most current policy directive or interpretation. SAO requests for clarification or suggestions for improvement should be addressed to the Unified Command Comptroller. The Unified Command, in turn, should refer requests or suggestions to the DSCA Resource Management Division, ATTN: Compt/RM, Washington, DC 20301-2800. The DSCA POC is Mr. Ken Eisenhardt, (703) 604-6551, DSN 664-6551, FAX (703) 604-6536, E-mail eisenhardt@osd.pentagon.mil Additional copies of this Handbook may be requested from the Defense Institute of Security Assistance Management, ATTN: DISAM/DRP, 2535 Seventh Street, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7803, (937) 255-2994, DSN 785-2994, FAX (937) 255-4319. This Handbook is also posted on both the DSCA and DISAM home pages. James A. McQuality ATTACHMENT : |
||
T-20 Administrative Funds 20 July 2001
PREFACE
The Security Assistance Administrative Trust Fund (T-20) Budget Policy Handbook for SAOs is a comprehensive guide to the Security Assistance Organization (SAO) budget preparation and financial execution processes. It incorporates and supplements guidance contained in the Security Assistance Management Manual (SAMM) and other Department of Defense (DoD), joint service, military department, and Unified Command references. This Handbook provides the unified commands, SAO chiefs, and SAO budget officers a compilation of budget-related concepts, definitions, policies, and procedures for the management of the Security Assistance Administrative Trust Fund (T-20) used to support SAO operations. This handbook supplements U.S. government directives, instructions, and manuals. The information contained herein is the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) policy and should be followed for the management of T-20 funds. In the event of conflicting guidance in other official sources, the SAO should consult with the unified command comptroller's office to ascertain the most current policy directive or interpretation. This handbook also discusses briefly other sources of funds that the SAO chief may be responsible and accountable for. This is done with the intention to alert the SAO chief and budget officer that they will have to assure that the proper program funds are used for the accomplishment of the various taskings that are given to the SAO. The unified command or the executive agent for those programs will provide procedures for those program funds. Any requests for clarification or suggestions for improvement should be addressed to the unified command's comptroller office. The unified command, in turn, should refer requests or suggestions to the DSCA, Resource ATTN: DSCA/Compt/RM), Washington, DC 20301-2800; DSN 664-6551, commercial number (703) 604-6551, FAX DSN 664-6536 or commercial number (703) 604-6536. Additional copies of this handbook may be requested from the Defense Institute of Security Assistance Management (DISAM/DRP), 2335 Seventh Street, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433-7803; DSN 785-3196 or commercial number (937) 255-3196, FAX DSN 986-6485 commercial number (937) 656-4685. |
|
CHAPTER 1 - Introduction
Purpose
Financial Management of the security assistance organization (SAO) is an important function. This chapter provides background information regarding the security assistance budget and general aspects of funds management that would apply to any military office of financial management. More specific information regarding the direct applications to security assistance funding will be covered in subsequent chapters.
Background
All security assistance officers have important responsibilities with regards to the budgeting for, control of, and utilization of funds provided for the execution of their security assistance (SA) mission. SAO Security assistance trust fund (T-20) budgets are based on operational mission requirements and personnel authorized to perform those tasks. Because of this, it is critical to be able to segregate the SA workload from the workload for operation and maintenance funds U.S. Forces (O&M) -funded positions in a specific country. The Congressional Budget Justification for Foreign Operations (CPD) document (commonly referred to as the CPD) for security assistance programs is prepared annually; it specifies the projected SA programs for the forthcoming year. The SAO staffing levels and costs authorized from previous years and the projections and justifications for the next budget year are included in the CPD. This document accompanies the Executive Branch's proposed SA authorization legislation. Prior to the preparation of the CPD, the DoD reviews the staffing requirements in conjunction with the Department of State, the chiefs of the U.S. diplomatic missions and regional commanders-in-Chief chief to ensure that SAOs are properly staffed to conduct their SA missions efficiently. The primary document used to validate the staffing is the Joint Manpower Program (JMP) document (including NSDD-38 approved changes not yet reflected in the JMP) for each SAO. DSCA and The State Department's Office of Regional Security and Arms Transfer Policy (PM/RSAT) and Defense Security Cooperation Agency are jointly responsible for the final consolidation and coordination of the data to be included in the CPD. The CPD provides the detailed supporting documentation and justification, prepared by the administration in its justification to the Congress of the proposed annual U.S. SA program. After receiving the CPD and the President's draft legislative proposal for an authorization/appropriation bill for the SA programs, the Congress will review the proposal and conduct hearings. Legislative enactment of the authorization and/appropriation bill completes the cycle. However, by this time, the succeeding year's' development cycle should already have been initiated.
General Principles
Fiduciary Responsibility The SAO chief should be fully aware of the status of all aspects of financial resources for which that office is responsible. The SAO chief, similar to any unit commander's responsibility for managing a budget allotment, is administratively accountable and responsible for all assigned funds, including any over-obligation, over-expenditure, or misuse that may occur. Larger SAOs may be authorized a position for a SAO fiscal and/Budget budget officer (officer, NCO, or civilian). Normally, this will be an additional duty of one of the assigned officers; the fiscal officer is the individual responsible to the SAO chief for the control of operating funds issued by the unified command. The fiscal officer should be appointed in writing, and copies should be provided to the unified command budget/Resource resource office. Review of SAO budget functions, as well as other areas warranting sound internal control mechanisms, is included in the inspector general (IG) and other administrative assistance visits by the unified command. Mission-Based Budget Planning A critical element in financial management for a SAO is to determine which source of funds should be used for a particular function or activity. In the SA world there are different sources of funds with differing restrictions. (These will be addressed further in Chapter 2.) The source of the funds will make a difference in the nature of your responsibility in the overall accomplishment of your mission. The first step is to examine the mission and the assigned tasks of the organization to determine the most economical means by which they may be accomplished. This examination should review which program (Security Assistance, Counter Narcotics (CN), Partnership for Peace (PfP), Demining, Commanders-in-Chiefs Peacetime Engagement, etc.) should be responsible to provide the required budget support. Performance of the mission may be accomplished by any assigned member of the SAO regardless of the manpower billet this individual occupies;, however, the funds required to accomplished the mission must come from the appropriate funding source. This determination will allow the SAO to prepare separate budget estimates setting forth as accurately as possible the funds requirements for accomplishing the different mission goals. It is also critical that the correct fund source is used, since incorrect fund use is a violation of law and could result in administrative or more severe adverse actions on the individuals concerned. The preparation of an expenditure plan for utilization of funds authorized in response to the budget request is a part of the budget process. A plan is necessary to ensure that funds are made available when they are required. The unified command uses this plan to allocate funds as required on a quarterly basis. This plan will also assist the SAO to avoid over-commitments, over-obligations or, even worse, over-expenditures. Unlike the traditional belief that, "If funds are not used during the fiscal year, next years funds will be decreased," SAO T-20 budgets are developed and supported based on realistic needs to meet the SAO's annual operational requirements. The previous year's budget serves as a starting point, but because requirements are continually changing, annual requirements are the principal determining factor. Local Recording System A local recording system is required to monitor the status and utilization of authorized funds to be able to account for these funds in accordance with the policies set forth in this handbook. In addition, these records will provide the basic justification needed for subsequent budgets. A plan for regular review of the local "memorandum accounting records", as well as selected official records maintained by the Authorized Accounting Activity (AAA), will help avert any major problems. If problems are identified, the SAO Chief should ensure that corrective action is promptly taken, including steps to prevent future recurrences. The security assistance Automated Resource Management Suite of Software Programs (SAARMS) budget preparation and budget execution programs provide the SAO with the capability to budget and informally account for funds from all program sources. Currently these are the only approved programs for managing your T-20 funds. The SAARMS property program provides an automated program for the SAO to manage property resources and provide information for budget preparation. Training It is crucial that all SAO employees working with the budget have adequate training to understand the importance of funds management, accountability, and the priority of funds control. Everyone involved in the SAO should have a basic knowledge of financial management and of the operation of the SAARMS software programs (discussed in Chapter 7). The military services have basic courses for budget officers, including a fiscal law course, and DISAM provides training for SAARMS, both in residence and on-site. Additionally, training on the basic concepts of security assistance will assist the budget personnel in understanding how the system works and their role in the system. Economy and Efficiency SAOs are responsible for ensuring economical and efficient use of all of their resources. They must ensure that mechanisms are in place to assess the effectiveness of internal management control procedures related to accountability, record keeping, certification and the expenditure of funds. Additionally, they must ensure effective, efficient use of personnel and material resources.
Summary
The SAO chief should be directly involved in the development of the budget, including a review of proposed and on-going programs and the justification for them. Once the budget is approved, direct monitoring of the distribution and utilization of funds should be a regular practice. Internal management control procedures must be in place to evaluate the use of resources and correct potential financial trouble areas before they become unmanageable. In general, the SAO chief is responsible for the substance and validity of the SAO budget request, the costs that are actually incurred and charged against the available funds, and the resultant performance. |
|
CHAPTER 2 - Types of Funds
Purpose
This chapter defines the different types of funding authority available and the general controls associated with their use. More detailed information on the utilization of funds is in Chapter 4. There are several types of funds available to the security assistance office (SAO). The program source of the funds directs how and the purposes for which the funds can be used, as well as controlling how they are used in support of the security assistance (SA) and peacetime engagement programs. Unfortunately, there are many different programs that make funds available for the activities conducted by the SAO. Each of these will have its own specific rules for their use and accountability. Security Assistance Administrative Funds Defense Security Cooperation Agency is responsible for directing the allocation of SA funds for the operating costs of SAOs based on the information provided in the SAO budgets. Since fiscal year 1983, the basic operating costs of SAOs have been financed using the foreign military dates (FMS) administrative account (account # 8242) as the carrier account.
SAO Operational Funds Security Assistance Trust Fund Administrative Funds for the SA-related administrative costs of the unified command headquarters and the SAOs are designated as budget project T-20 funds. SAO Representational Funds SAO representation funds are resourced from the SA administrative funds and are included in the operating budget (T-20) for each SAO as a limitation authority. These funds, which are used to maintain the prestige of the United States in a foreign community, have very strict controls and limitations. The fund ceiling is issued by DSCA to the unified command for each geographic area. The unified command sets a representation fund ceiling for each SAO in the approved annual funding program. Individual SAO representation fund ceilings are part of a worldwide ceiling established by law. Established ceilings assigned to the SAOs will not be exceeded unless authorized by the unified command. Unified Command Administrative Funds. Security assistance trust fund administrative funds for the SA-related operating costs for unified command headquarters' administrative expenses associated with both FMS and non-FMS segments of the security assistance program are called budget project T-20 funds. These are the funds allocated to the geographic unified commands for their operating expenses in support of the SAOs. These funds are not further allocated to the SAO, nor are they used for SAO operational requirements. Figure 2-1, SAO Funding Authority Flow
Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Case Fund Citations Special programs within a country can be supported directly through the use of FMS case funds. This means that the country has established a FMS case to fund the costs of a specific requirement. Some examples of case-funded activities are technical assistance field teams (TAFTs), mobile training teams (MTTs), mobile education teams (METs), or management lines on a FMS case for services, training or material. The cost of the personnel associated with these teams, including the overhead expenses, will be charged directly to the FMS case. The proponent military service that has cognizance over the case manages these funds. Case funds should be provided to the SAO to support the in-country expenses directly related to these cases. The SAO should be involved in the case preparation phase of the development of a FMS case by providing estimated in-country cost for deployed personnel. The CONUS case/program manager provides instructions for use of case funds in the case implementing directive or other specific instruction and ensures that these funds are cited on the travel orders of the members of the team. Case funds do not have to be requested from or monitored by DSCA, but applicable obligations/expenses under the local cognizance of the team commander may be tracked in security assistance automated resources management system (SAARMS) to perform memorandum accounting and financial reporting to the FMS case manager. The CONUS case manager, of course, is responsible for overall case financial tracking and reconciliation. Another frequent use of case funds is temporary duty (TDY) associated with a particular program. The SAO personnel required to travel in support of a specific FMS program for a country, such as to attend a program management review (PMR) for an aircraft sale, may be authorized to use case funds. Case funds should be requested from the appropriate service case manager. Before such TDY orders are prepared by the SAO, a FMS case funds cite must be requested from, and approved by, the CONUS case/program manager responsible for that particular case. Only when they are not available, should T-20 funds be used. The SAOs are required to request permission of the unified command funds manager for use of SAO T-20 funds to support a FMS case. SAOs must insure that costs supporting FMS cases and case personnel are charged to the case and not to the SAO's T-20 funds. This will require separate International Cooperative Administrative Support System (ICASS) agreements as well. International Military Education And Training (IMET) I Fund Citation Special programs within a country can be supported directly through the use of international military education and training (IMET) fund citation funds. This means that the country has established an IMET training line or lines to fund the costs of a specific requirement. Some examples of IMET funded activities are language training detachments (LTDs), mobile training teams (MTTs), mobile education teams (METs), lines for support and training materials. The cost of the personnel associated with these teams, including the overhead expenses, will be charged to the service/country IMET program. The proponent service that has cognizance over the specific IMET line manages these funds. Security assistance officers must insure that costs supporting IMET personnel are charged to the IMET program and not to the SAO's T-20 funds. This will require separate ICASS agreements as well. Assistance in Kind Assistance-in-kind (AIK) refers to the non-monetary support that a host government provides the SAO under bilateral agreements. This may include vehicles, office space, personnel, utilities and housing, among other things. While not a funded program, AIK must be annotated in the SAO budget submission. It must be taken into account because these functions, if they are valid requirements, may need to be funded should the AIK agreement be terminated. Contributed Currencies Contributed currencies are funds provided by the host government as a result of a bilateral agreement. The amounts of contributed currencies are identified in a special exhibit contained in the SAO budget submission, and although, by law they are not made available for expenditure by the SAO, they represent an offset to the total costs incurred for SAOs by U.S. government appropriated funds. Only a very few countries have contributed currencies. Operation and Maintenance Appropriated Funds Funds appropriated by congress through the program objective memorandum (POM) process for the support of the U.S. forces in the conduct of day-to-day operations may also be made available to the SAO for those non-SA requirements in which personnel, both SA and non-SA, assigned to the SAO may be engaged. These funds support personnel and operational costs in the same manner that T-20 funds support SA requirements. The O&M funds are managed in accordance with the cognizant Service (Executive Agent) directives and regulations, and procedures. The SAARMS Budget Execution Module can accommodate and provide memorandum accounting for these funds. O&M funds are usually restricted to a specific use for a specific period of time and require separate tracking. Some examples are:
The SAO may be required to prepare budgets for these funds in addition to the SA T-20 budget. The SAARMS budget preparation module will accommodate these requirements as well.
Summary
It is important to know the sources of SAO funding to understand the proper application of costs. Each category of funds has restrictions. Proper management, accountability, and tracking of funds are critical to budget justifications. |
|
CHAPTER 3 - The Budget Process Previous chapters have delineated some of the general principles that apply to security assistance office (SAO), budgetary management and the various sources of funds that fund the SAO direct and indirect operating costs. This chapter describes the organizations and milestones associated with the SAO budget process.
Organizations Involved in the Budgetary Process:
Congress Congress authorizes and appropriates certain funds used by SAOs, and only when they are not available, should Administrative Trust Fund funds be used. In particular, foreign military financing (FMF) administrative funds are one of the financing sources of budget project T-20 (unified command and security assistance office (SAO) operating expenses). The approved level of FMF administrative expenses is contained in the annual foreign operations appropriation, as is the expenditure limit on the use of representational funds. Moreover, the proposed budgetary and manning levels for SAOs are included as part of the Congressional Budget Justification (CBJ) and are subject to review by the Congress. The Congress is also the appropriation source of operations and maintenance (O&M) funds for those SAOs with missions in areas other than SA, e.g., international cooperative programs (ICP). Congress also approves the SA manpower authorization for each SAO through the CBJ process, including National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 38 process approved changes made during the year. Office of Management and Budget The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) assists the President in the preparation of the annual U.S. government budget and the formulation of the nation's fiscal policy. The OMB further controls the apportionment of appropriated funds for obligation and expenditure in support of SA activities. The OMB also publishes Circular A 11, which specifies the object class codes to be used by the executive branch. (See Appendix D.) Department of State (DoS) The Department of State (DoS) has statutory responsibility for SA policy. It has overall responsibility and authority for SA programs and determines what assistance will be provided or what sales or grants will be made to which countries or international organizations. In this regard, the DoS is the principal proponent of the CBJ (which is jointly prepared by DoS and DSCA). SAO Budget Preparation and Execution The Department of State is the cognizant executive department for the management of U.S. diplomatic missions; the SAO chief is generally being a member of the ambassador's country team structure. In addition, DoS is in charge of the financial service centers (FSCs) which make check payments for most embassies/SAOs or, in those cases where the embassy fiscal officer makes the check or cash payments, collect disbursement data relating to SAO budgetary obligations. The supporting FSC forwards all disbursing data to the interagency clearinghouse for further transfer to the appropriate DoD authorized accounting activity (AAA) that performs the SAO's official accounting function. DFAS-AYADS/DE is the AAA for T-20 funds. Office of the Secretary of Defense Military and civilian members are subject to DoD directives and regulations, such as policies relative to entitlements (e.g., dependent schooling, funded environmental morale leave (FEML)). Also, certain billets in some SAOs are funded from O&M accounts in support of programs of interest to Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)/acquisition staff, (e.g., International Cooperative Programs (ICP)), and commander-in chief personnel performing peacetime engagement activities and military to military functions. The DoD Comptroller promulgates financial policy directives and manuals, which must be followed by the service administrative agencies and Defense Accounting Offices (DFAS). Joint Staff The Joint Staff approves the Joint Manpower Plan (JMP), which reflects the authorized manpower billets at each SAO. The JMP for the unified command will include separate sections for the SA billets and the O&M billets. SAO JMP actions are coordinated with chief of the U.S. diplomatic mission (COM), the unified commands, JCS, and Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) prior to approval or modification via the National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 38 process. Defense Security Cooperation Agency The DSCA is the focal point within DoD for policy and management oversight of the administration and implementation of SA programs by the services, Defense agencies, SAOs, unified commands, and the DSCA Comptroller, Resource Management Division, are responsible for reviewing and approving the annual T-20 budgets and for establishing policies associated with the administration of these funds. DSCA works directly with DoS in policy and reimbursement matters concerning the International Cooperative Administrative Support Services (ICASS) agreements and security issues, which are used as the vehicle to provide embassy staff support to SAOs. An assistant secretary from the DoD Comptroller Office is a member of the ICASS executive board. A DSCA Resource Management Division representative serves on the ICASS Interagency Working Group. DSCA publishes the Security Assistance Management Manual (SAMM), DoD 5105.38-M that contains broad policies concerning SAO budgets. DSCA is also the parent agency for the Defense Institute of Security Assistance Management (DISAM), which is responsible for SAO education. DSCA Comptroller Office is the designated manager/office of primary responsibility for the Security Assistance Automated Resource Management Suite (SAARMS) policy and system requirements. DSCA also publishes this directive, which promulgates financial management policy and procedures for the SA Trust Fund Administrative Funds used for SAO operations and by the unified commands. Defense Finance and Accounting Service Reporting to the DoD Comptroller, the Director, Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), is responsible for the preparation and update of selected chapters within the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (DoD) 7000.14-R, Volume 15 Security Assistance Policy and Procedures. This volume is the basic reference for FMS pricing and accounting. DFAS Denver Center, Deputate for Security Assistance (DFAS-AYADS/DE), is responsible for issuing accounting policy for T-20 funds and T-20 funding allocations to the unified commands (with the T-20 funding being further passed on to the SAOs by the unified command comptroller offices). DFAS-AYADS/DE is the authorized accounting activity (AAA) for T-20 funds and prepares and submits financial reports to DSCA, OMB, and treasury for all required SA program accounts. The DFAS-AYADS/DE Accounting Procedure Memorandums will be used as accounting policy for T-20 funds in lieu of the Administrative and Logistical Support of Overseas Security Assistance Organizations (AR 1-75/OPNAVINST 4900.31 GIAFR 400-45). The Defense Accounting Offices, which function as the authorized accounting activities for other funds that may be provided to SAOs, report to director, DFAS. Defense Civilian Personnel System All pay for U.S. civilians assigned to the SAO is centrally paid by DCPS, Charleston. DFAS allots the funds to DCPS and receives reports, which are then provided to the SAOs. The SAO will set up a separate OA/FCA for U.S. civilian pay. This OA/FCA is for recording and management purposes only and will not be uploaded in the end-of-month uploads. Military Services The Services are designated as executive agencies for delegated SAO support functions on a regional basis. The Army has executive agency for U.S. European Command and U.S. Southern Command, the Navy for U.S. Pacific Command, and the Air Force for U.S. Central Command. The Services also are the principal implementing agencies for FMS cases, and such cases may be a source of travel/temporary duty (TDY) funding for SAO members attending program management reviews. Unified Commands The commander-in-chief of each unified command commands the SAO in all matters that are not functions of the COM and also performs selected staff and administrative support functions, (e.g., judge advocate, comptroller/budget, automated data processing). The unified command comptroller's office or funding resource manager receives the annual budget call memorandum from DSCA. The unified command transmits the budget call to the SAOs within its area of responsibility (AOR) with any specific guidance. The proposed SAO budgets are, reviewed by the unified command prior to submission to DSCA. As the fiscal year (FY) begins, DSCA (through DFAS-AYADS/DE) allocates the T-20 funds to the unified command, with the SAOs receiving their T-20 budget execution authorities from the unified command. The unified command serves as the principal point of assistance to the SAO, responding to questions as they arise and periodically sending staff assistance representatives, including Inspection General (IG) teams, to the SAOs. The unified commands perform the following SAO budget-related functions:
Embassy The ambassador (COM) is in charge of the country team and sets local policies that apply to all in-country offices, including SAOs. The embassy fiscal officer will provide support to the SAO in accordance with the terms of the ICASS agreement. Under ICASS, the embassy fiscal officer may disburse funds for SAO obligations, or request that the supporting FSC make the disbursement. All disbursements are reported to the State FSC, which, in turn, requests reimbursement from DFAS-AYADS/DE. The embassy may also provide contracting officer services to the SAO for contracts negotiated on behalf of the SAO, unless the SAO has a contracting officer authorized and assigned. Security Assistance Organizations The security assistance organization (SAO) chief is responsible for the overall management of the SAO budget, including its preparation and execution, all the while observing the requisite internal management controls. This includes the utilization of SAARMS software programs. The budget preparation module is the tool for the preparation of the SAO budget. The budget execution module is the automated tool for "memorandum accounting" at the SAO level. The budget execution module is used to provide feeder data and reports to the parent unified command and DFAS-AYADS/DE (For T-20 funds), or the appropriate AAA or for O&M funds. The SAO should perform the following budget -- related functions:
Budget Approval Cycle
Budget Call During the first quarter of the calendar year, the DSCA/Compt/RM will prepare and release the annual SAO budget call for the President's budget. This budget call memorandum, which contains specific guidance and instructions relative to the preparation of the budget, is sent to the unified commands. The unified commands and the SAOs are expected to stay within prescribed budget funding targets, with full justification being required for exceptional circumstances that might warrant any requested increase above the target. The unified commands transmit the budget call, along with any unified command -- specific instructions, to the SAOs. Budget Preparation The SAARMS budget preparation module will be used to prepare the SAO budget. The budget preparation module will provide the data files and appropriate reports to the unified command. In determining its budgetary projections, the SAO must be sensitive to any future changes, (in manpower levels, etc.) which will have an impact on the budget data. Equally important, the SAO must return its completed budget package to the unified command by the prescribed suspense date. The SAARMS budget preparation module incorporates the data input into the required data to be forwarded to the unified command and will also incorporate prior year historical data. Budget Review and Approval The unified command collects the budget inputs from the SAOs and consolidates the data for unified command submission to DSCA. SAO budgets may be modified up or down, and some UFRs may be funded prior to submission of the package to DSCA. The unified command will provide SAOs with updated budget data and targets. DSCA consolidates the worldwide SAO budgets. In this second command-level review process, SAO budget levels may again be adjusted. Next, the SAO T-20 budgetary levels and FMF administrative fund requirements are entered into the CBJ and President's budget draft documents, which are reviewed by DoS and the OMB. The OMB, in representing the President's guidance and priorities, can direct changes to be made as well. Almost one year from the time the initial DSCA budget call was issued, the official CBJ, the President's budget, and other supporting documents are transmitted to Congress. The cognizant congressional committees begin the hearings, mark-up, and House-Senate reconciliation processes which lead to a bill being passed. The foreign military financing (FMF) portion of the T-20 budget is limited by the specific FMF appropriation and, in recent years, the Congress has also set an overall ceiling on the FMS trust fund administrative budget obligations during the fiscal year.
Budget Execution Cycle
Allocation and Allotment When DSCA has completed its review of the T-20 budget submissions, it issues memoranda to each unified command documenting the results of the budget review. The memorandum provides an approved annual funding program (AFP) for the current budget execution year and budget planning level amount for the budget year request about to be included in the President's budget submission. Based upon the approved annual funding programs, DSCA issues a request to DFAS-AYADS/DE to issue a FMS administrative fund allocation of budget authority for the first quarter requirements for SAO operating expenses to the unified commands. In turn, DFAS-AYADS/DE sends a fund certification authority (FCA) to the unified commands allocating FMS administrative fund obligation and expenditure authority in amounts matched to the DSCA authority. The unified commands, in turn, sub-allocates funding received from DFAS Denver and issues FCA documents to the SAOs. This funding allocation provides SAOs with the authority to obligate and authorize the expenditure of funds for all of their local operating costs. This authority is issued on a quarterly basis. Processing Transactions The SAO enters the obligation authority, generates obligations, and record payments (expenditures) into the SAARMS budget execution module. In this regard, it is important to note that SAARMS is a "memorandum accounting system," which provides reports to the official accounting system. The budget execution module provides a means by which the SAO chief can maintain financial control with the posting/processing of estimated transaction amounts. However, the Authorized Accounting Activity (AAA) and Defense Accounting Office maintains the official accounting records. DFAS-AYADS/DE is the AAA for T-20 funds. When processing transactions, the key to reconciliation is document number and accounting classification integrity. In effect, the document number (and accounting classification/fund citation for purchase requests or services) must be perpetuated throughout the financial phases of a transaction (i.e., from commitment and obligation to expenditure and disbursement). This principle must be conveyed to the embassy fiscal officer and general services officer (GSO), since the embassy submits expenditure data to the Foreign Commercial Service (FSC). Otherwise, if the embassy is reassigning its own document numbers without cross reference to (and perpetuation of) each of the initial SAO obligation document numbers, subsequent matching and reconciliation of obligation and expenditure transactions is impossible. The SAO is responsible for reconciling transactions to the extent possible (i.e., providing the AAA/Defense Accounting Office supporting data and documents to facilitate the matching of expenditures to obligations and updating SAARMS memorandum records accordingly). Status of Funds Report The SAARMS budget execution module automatically generates a status of funds report. This report shows, by budget management category/object class, the cumulative obligations and associated percentages of obligations by budget category. It reflects the percentage of deviation of the actual versus the planned totals. This is a valuable tool for the SAO chief, the unified command, and DFAS-AYADS/DE in tracking the SAO's spending profile as the budget year progresses. This report shows the status of funds as of the time it is generated.
Summary
The SAO budget process starts with a budget call from DSCA, which is transmitted to the SAO by the unified command. In preparing its budget, the SAO uses the SAARMS budget preparation module. Once the unified command and DSCA have reviewed and approved the SAO's budget and, following the congressional budget cycle and enactment of the requisite legislation, DSCA releases quarterly allocations to DFAS-AYADS/DE and an annual funding program to the unified command. The unified command, in turn, transmits budget execution authority to the SAO on a quarterly basis. Upon commencement of the execution cycle, the SAO uses the SAARMS budget execution module to "load" its budget limitation categories and proceeds to record transactions (i.e., commitments, obligations, and expenditures) as they occur. A necessary part of the execution process is the reconciliation of outstanding or unmatched transactions so that the AAA and Defense Accounting Offices records are as accurate and current as possible. |
|
CHAPTER 4 - Utilization of Funds
Purpose
This chapter addresses the special policies and rules that apply to budget sources and object classes. These policies have been adopted to comply with sound fiscal management practices and to standardize the worldwide community of SAOs. SAO chiefs and budget officers must follow these policies unless appropriate authority has granted an exception. The unified command and DSCA are first in the chain of command to ascertain if exceptions have been granted and by whom for the SAOs.
General Policies
Request for Policy Clarification or Exceptions Clarification as to policies contained in this handbook (or in the annual Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) budget call or any separate policy memoranda/messages), including requests for exceptions, should be forwarded by the Security Assistance Office (SAO) to the unified command comptroller's/funding resource manager's office. The unified command will screen and respond to inquiries where the policy is understood and the DSCA position is already known. Policy exception requests warranting further consideration will be referred by the unified command to the DSCA/Compt/RM for resolution. Workload Distribution by Functional Area The SAO, foreign military dales (FMS) and foreign military finance (FMF) administrative budget funds (collectively known as T-20 funds) should only be used for recognized SA-related functions. The SAO authorized staffing has used the workload distribution to develop the SA security assistance (SA) versus O&M portions of the joint manpower plan (JMP) for the SAO. Conversely, performance or support of missions beyond the scope of the defined SA-related functional areas must be financed from the appropriate benefiting appropriation. For example, non-SA missions that support the unified command (e.g., exercises and unified command logistics agreements offices (LAO), and other peacetime engagement activities) would be funded from O&M or other funds made available to the respective unified command. Each SAO is required to submit as part of its budget data submission SAO workload data. The budget preparation module provides reports for DSCA and the unified command from this data. These reports show the percentage distribution of the organization's workload among SA and non-SA functions by fiscal year (FY). This data is used by DSCA to determine the amount of worldwide SAO funding which should come from each of the two SA sources cited previously. The data may also indicate whether or not Department of Defense (DoD) funds are required at particular SAOs based on the amount non-SA operational requirements (e.g., defense cooperation in armaments activity, ship visits, TCA, or other military-to-military activities).
Disposition of SA-Funded Equipment
Redistribution. If an SAO is scheduled to close or downsize the SA mission or otherwise no longer has use for equipment in good condition, the SAO should contact the unified command to ascertain if the equipment should be redistributed to another SAO location. Proceeds from Sale Disposal If redistribution action to another T-20 account is not appropriate, and sale or transfer disposes of the SAO equipment, the proper fund cite must be shown when depositing the funds received. The proper funds cite is that of the funds monies that were used to finance the acquisition of the specific equipment item. These fund cites are:
Transfer of Trust Fund (T-20) Acquired Property to O & M Activities. Property of an SAO that was acquired through T-20 funding may be transferred to O&M accounts when realignment of SAO functions occur because of changes in mission. Fair market value is the criteria for the transfer value, and proceeds should be returned to the trust fund. SAOs and unified command will coordinate with DSCA to determine if the gaining activity will be required to reimburse the trust fund for the equipment. O&M and Other Appropriation Financed Equipment Contact the unified command or executive agent for guidance for the procedures and proper fund cite. Method of Funding The SAO budget and budget execution is prepared and implemented based on how the obligation authority is distributed.
Specific Policies for Direct Costs
Automated Data Processing (ADP) Support ? Centralized Funding & Procurement When feasible, DSCA will authorize centralized funding and procurement for ADP equipment when buys of sufficient quantity are required. This may include centralized buys for an individual unified command. The unified commands will submit their ADP requirements with their budgets. DSCA/CIO will validate the requirements, and the appropriate activity will be directed to procure centrally those items when it is determined to be economically feasible to do so. DSCA will pass all others back to the unified commands for local purchase. Normally the central purchase will be limited to CPUs, and monitors (including the keyboard and mouse). Minimum Specifications Procurement of equipment and supplies to satisfy all microcomputer needs, including the needs of the Security Assistance Network (SAN), must adhere to the guidance in the Security Assistance Management Manual (SAMM), Section 1504 (as updated by any interim memorandum or message changes). A table in this SAMM section lists minimum equipment specifications when ordering additional or replacement automated data processing (ADP) equipment. Deviations must be coordinated through the unified command and approved by the DSCA process analysis integration division (DSCA/COMPT/PAID). The unified command will determine the method of access to the internet that the SAOs will use. It may be a unified command system or a local Internet service provider (ISP). Tempest Equipment For SAOs located in selected embassy or other highly secure spaces, local policy may require the utilization of "tempest approved" equipment. Due to the increased cost, DSCA will normally only fund such equipment when its need is sufficiently justified, and it is a universal requirement for other offices on site. The SAO will utilize non- "tempest approved" equipment that complies with the minimum specifications in the SAMM, Section 1504, for all offices at an embassy where the "tempest approved" requirement does not apply. Depreciation and Replacement Funding for ADP equipment, operations, and maintenance shall be a routine part of the SAO budget process. ADP equipment replacements should be allocated among future budget years based on depreciation schedules. Expectations that all or the majority of the organization's ADP equipment can be replaced in a given year based on "fall-out" funds are unrealistic. SAOs should follow the depreciation schedule established by the DSCA/CIO. ADP equipment items will normally be depreciated on a three-year basis. However, equipment items should be retained longer if they are in good operating condition and compatible with existing SAN or other ADP computer programs or as directed by the unified command or DSCA.
Education of Dependents
Basic Guidance Education of dependents is a "must-pay" requirement in the budget execution process. The unified command will issue guidelines on dependent tuition rates in conjunction with the budget call. The following general guidelines apply:
Budgeting & Reporting Costs
Dependent Education Travel. Command-sponsored dependents attending high school away from the sponsor's duty station are entitled to three round trips per year to the sponsor's duty location (e.g., London Central High School students). Command-sponsored dependents that are authorized to attend high school or college in Continental United States (CONUS) are entitled to one round trip per year to the sponsor's duty location. This entitlement includes one 250-pound unaccompanied baggage allowance annually and CONUS storage costs of up to 350 pounds. (See Joint Travel Regulation, Chapter 7.)
Funded Environmental and Morale Leave
Funded Environmental and Morale Leave (FEML) Entitlement. The FEML program authorizes transportation or reimbursement for such transportation to an authorized FEML destination from the SAO permanent duty site of the SAO military member and his command-sponsored dependents that are assigned to a FEML-authorized duty location. They are entitled to one trip during a two-year tour and two trips during a three-year tour. Generally, a member may not perform FEML travel within six months of the beginning or end of a tour. Dependents must be command-sponsored, but may travel unaccompanied by the SAO member. DoD civilians with a transportation agreement are authorized home leave in accordance with civilian personnel regulations. FEML duty locations and destinations are recertified biennially by the unified command and approved by Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The DoD Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Part S, identify the approved FEML countries and their designated destinations. An SAO not currently authorized FEML may request its permanent duty location be designated as a FEML location by submitting appropriate justification through their unified command to OSD. DSCA is included in the coordination process for such requests during the OSD staffing process, since FEML transportation costs for SAO members are paid with SAO operating budget (T-20) funds.
Household Furnishings and Appliances Household furnishings and appliances may be approved for purchase for use in SAO members' quarters when local conditions justify such purchases and for representational requirements for the SAO chief. Housing -- Rental/Leases-OHA and Government Leased Basic Policy. DSCA policy is to allow the unified command to determine whether government-leased housing or private leasing using the Overseas Housing Allowance is appropriate based on conditions in individual countries. Government-Leased Housing (GLH). DSCA will support and fund GLH for SAO security assistance personnel when approved by the unified command. SAOs request GLH through their unified command. DSCA approval and SA funding for GLH can only support SA personnel. Leases for non-SA funded personnel assigned to SAOs must be approved/funded by the unified command. All requests for new leases and for renewal of existing leases that exceed $25,000, to include utility costs, must be reviewed and approved by the unified command after review and approval by the Embassy Inter-Agency Housing Board. The SAO chief may approve lease replacements and lease renewals under $25,000 for SAO members provided that the embassy regional security office (RSO) and general services officer (GSO) concur with the terms, conditions, and location of the leased quarters. The unified command must approve the chief's quarters and must have the RSO and GSO endorsement. If a waiver to the space standards is required, this, too, should be obtained from the Department of State before submitting a request for approval to the unified command. Funds for new replacement leases or renewals should be programmed in advance and included in the FY budget submissions. Additional new leases should be separately identified and justified as an unfunded request. Requests for lease replacements or renewals which exceed the $25,000 cost threshold should reach the unified command sufficiently in advance of the renewal or start date to provide adequate time for review and approval before signing the lease. Lease requests forwarded to the unified command should include the following information:
Each SAO should complete the applicable budget data to identify housing arrangements and total lease costs for authorized personnel. Language Training
Property Authorization and Repair/Replacement
Representational Funds
Vehicles
Procurement Policy "Buy American" Acquisition Rules. As noted in AR 1-75/OPNAVINST 4900.31/AFR 400-45, SAOs must consider the following when purchasing or leasing a vehicle:
Emergency Replacement. When there is a requirement for an un-programmed replacement, (e.g. accident, theft, fire, etc.) the SAO will submit an unfunded requirement to the unified command if it cannot be funded from within the SAO budget. Domicile-to-Duty Transportation (DTDT). Only the unified command or higher authority can only authorize DTDT. The COM does not have this authority for SAO members. (See DoD 4500.36-R.)
Specific Policies for Indirect Costs
Aircraft (C-12) Flying Hours General Guidance. As noted in the SAMM, Section 130304, dedicated C-12 aircraft have been assigned to selected countries. The primary mission of the dedicated C-12 aircraft is to support SAO program management. There is no legal basis to use SAO SA administrative (T-20) funds for C-12 flights for other than SA management purposes. However, other missions may be flown when they do not have an adverse impact on the SA mission and when they are reimbursed. SAOs with C-12 aircraft must also abide by the policies in the aforementioned SAMM section. Budget Preparation The proposed current year and budget year flying hour programs must be justified by presenting detailed information in support of the total hours requested in the following four categories:
Flying Hours Reductions (Note for Unified Command): Reductions to flying hours/costs may not be realigned to other cost categories in the budget development; a direct reduction to the total target level is required. Flying hours may be realigned among countries; however, an unfunded request may not be submitted for additional hours for a country where the unified command has reduced below the DSCA-approved level. Antiterrorism/Force Protection The Department of State is responsible for security of DoD personnel assigned to U.S. diplomatic missions abroad in accordance with the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 unless the unified command has assumed the responsibility through a Memorandum of Understanding signed by the ambassador (COM) and the commander-in-chiefs (CINC). Security equipment, including residential security upgrades, is considered a State Department funding responsibility. DSCA will work with the unified commands, SAOs, and State Department to provide the necessary funding to provide adequate protection for the SAOs in those instances where the State Department cannot provide funding. When funds are not available at the unified command, the request should be forwarded to DSCA. Within the budget submission, the explanation for physical security upgrades should identify the item and whether it is for the office or a residence. This justification will include a statement from the region security office (RSO) that the upgrades are valid requirements. If local guard services are for other than residences, this must be explained. Assistance-In-Kind (AIK) Assistance-in-Kind (AIK), that is provided by the host country will be entered in the special exhibit section under the category AIK in the SAARMS budget preparation module. The data will be entered in the various object class entries in the same manner as for T-20. Estimates of cost for these services supplied by the host country should be based on what it would cost if the SAO had to budget for them from T-20 funds. Consecutive Overseas Tour Leave An SAO member and command-sponsored dependents that are entitled to consecutive overseas tour consecutive overseas tour (COT) or in-place consecutive overseas tour (IPCOT) leave will have their transportation and per diem funded as follows:
Emergency Evacuation In those exceptional situations where emergency evacuation of dependents and sponsors are directed, state and/or the unified command will provide specific instructions. Emergency Leave Authorization for SAO Military Members. T-20 funded SAO military members and command-sponsored dependents granted emergency leave by the SAO Chief are authorized round-trip commercial transportation at T-20 expense, provided government transportation is not reasonably available to the Continental United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or U.S. possessions per AR 1-75/OPNAVINST 4900.31/AFR 400-45. In accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Volumes I and II, the cost of commercial transportation authorized will not exceed the cost of government-procured commercial air travel from the international airport nearest the location of the member upon notification of the emergency or the location of the SAO member's permanent duty station to the international airport in CONUS to which a scheduled flight is available that is closest to:
There is no requirement to have a direct flight to the authorized airport, whether it is to the international airport nearest the location where the member was notified or to the international airport nearest the member's permanent duty station. Round trip transportation between overseas areas where there is an air mobility command (AMC) airlift service industrial fund (ASIF) is also authorized. SAO U.S. Civilian Members and Dependents. T-20 funded U.S. civilians and their dependents, when bona fide immediate family emergencies arise may use ASIF channel aircraft on a space-required basis. They will pay the transportation cost at the U.S. government rate tariff to AMC in accordance with AFR 76-11. These individuals also have an option to travel on a non-reimbursable, space-available basis on DoD-controlled aircraft (see DoD 4515.13-R, paragraph 4-5). Commercial travel in connection with emergency leave will be at the civilian member's expense for SAO members and their dependents. Travel at government expense is authorized when a civilian is in a TDY status. Emergency Medical and Dental Care SAO operating budget funds can be used to pay SAO member (military or civilian) or dependent transportation costs for emergency medical and dental care requiring immediate attention. Military members are also provided per diem allowances in accordance with the DoD Joint Federal Travel Regulations. FMS case funds should be used to pay for emergency medical and dental transportation costs for FMS case-funded personnel.
International Cooperative Administrative Support System What It Is. International cooperative administrative support system (ICASS) is a State Department of State system that provides administrative services to U.S. government offices located overseas, to include SAOs. ICASS services include civilian personnel management, communications, information systems, budget and fiscal, and general services. These services are provided on a reimbursable basis at the Washington D.C. level, and actual SAO charges are settled between DSCA and the Department of State with SAO input. See Chapter 6 for more information concerning ICASS. SAO Mentorship. All SAOs must carefully monitor their use of ICASS and ensure that the workload factors used by the embassy are accurate. SAO chiefs will ensure that the ICASS agreement and charges are reviewed annually to be sure that charges are reasonable. In this regard: SAOs should reconcile cost differences between the Department of State Department's final ICASS bill and its local embassy's stated charges. Preference for "direct charges". Department of State and DoD continue to seek ways to improve the ICASS system so that the user (SAO) is directly charged for actual services received, rather than charged pro-rated (distributed) costs based upon a complex computer-generated formula. If the embassy applies direct charges for a service, the SAO should verify that a duplicate charge is not included in the ICASS allotment for this same service. SAOs should work closely through local ICASS councils in seeking cost-effective and quality service improvements. Budget Preparation. The current and budget year ICASS costs should be stated in prior year constant dollars.
International Armaments Cooperative Programs (IACP) is a non-SA functional area. Unified commands should submit a consolidated budget summary, and country budget submissions identifying all the costs associated with those SAO joint manpower program (JMP) billets that are funded by service appropriations as IACP. IACP includes armaments cooperation (AC), defense cooperation in armaments (DCA), and defense industrial cooperation (DIC). Medical/Dental Care (Non-Emergency)
Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Costs
Personal Services Contracts DoD activities are precluded by law from entering into any contract that is of a personal services nature. Law, on the other hand, permits State Department of State to enter into personal service contracts. The SAO is a DoD activity that relies on the local embassy to perform contract officer functions on its behalf. The SAO chief must insure that no contracts of a personal service nature are initiated on the SAO's behalf. This includes contracts where the SAO could be included as a part of an embassy support contract. Prior Year Obligations
Any obligations determined to be no longer valid will be de-obligated and subsequently withdrawn by the unified command. De-obligation of prior year funds with subsequent re-obligation of the same funds is not permitted. Valid disbursements may be made from these accounts up to the amount of unliquidated obligation balances for that year, and they will be processed against that year's obligations. Additional funding to cover upward adjustments in obligations must be requested from DSCA via the unified command. In this regard, the following information must be provided: original obligation amount, additional required funding authority, and source/reason for the additional obligation. All other upward obligation adjustments are charged against the current fiscal year account. Foreign Service National Separation Trust Foreign Service national separation trust (FSN). Severance pay may be either a direct or indirect budget cost. Select countries are required to pay severance pay during the current year. In these situations the SAO will budget for severance pay as a direct cost. Obligations for the current year will be generated and payments recorded against them. Those countries that manage severance pay as an indirect cost will include the requirement as and indirect cost in the budget submission. Each SAO will calculate the amount to be obligated each FY fiscal year and report that data as a memo entry in its budget submission. DSCA will consolidate the data and obligate funds centrally. Should a SAO require funds for separation pay during the year, the SAO will submit an unfinanced request through the unified command to DSCA. Travel Guidelines
Summary
Although the budgeting and expenditure of SAO operating (T-20) funds follow the basic rules associated with other U.S. government funds (e.g., O&M); there are some distinct and critical differences. It is imperative that T-20 funds be used only for expressly recognized security assistance-related functions. Accordingly, the SAO budget must accurately address its estimated workload by functional or benefiting area. There are special rules that must be adhered to relative to C-12 aircraft flying hours reporting, verification of ICASS, GLH, and the acquisition of vehicles and ADP equipment, to name a few areas warranting special attention. |
|
CHAPTER 5 - SAO Budget Preparation
Purpose
Accuracy and completeness of the budget submission will aid the unified command and Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) in the process of budget review. Complete justification, where required, will facilitate decision-making. The Security Assistance Automated Resources Management System (SAARMS) Budget Preparation Module will be used to prepare the Security Assistance Organization (SAO) budget submission. General The administrative budget for SAOs is prepared and submitted to the unified command for review and consolidation prior to submission to DSCA. This is done annually following the specific guidelines and limitations provided by DSCA in its annual Security Assistance Organizations (SAOs) budget call for the fiscal year (FY) 200X President's budget.
The budget call will include the total guidance figure by major cost category. These guidance figures will not be exceeded. Any funding requests above the guidance amounts should appear on the Unfunded Requests List. Budget data for personnel costs should be prepared using the staffing authorized in the Security Assistance Office Joint Manpower Plan (SAO JMP). Variations from the approved JMP must be justified with supporting documentation. Cost estimates for military personnel pay and unfunded civilian retirement costs are excluded from SAO budgets in accordance with Section 9104, PL 101-165, and FY 1990 Defense Appropriation Act. Cost estimates for SAO Coast Guard personnel will be determined by DSCA. The unified command prepares consolidated budget data and submits an overall assessment of SAO operations. Budget Preparation Module The budget preparation module will be used to prepare the SAO and unified command consolidated budget for DSCA. This module has been developed to accommodate the requirements of the SAO, the unified command, and DSCA for the development of the budget submissions. It was designed using the "zero-based" budget concept. This allows the SAO to verify the estimated costs of the recurring requirements, as well as one-time requirements. The entry screens are designed to allow the SAO to enter the level of detail needed to develop the budget and generate reports requested by the unified command to review, adjust if required, and consolidate the individual SAO budgets into a consolidated report to DSCA. The screen uses a color code to alert the SAO to the fields that must have data entered versus optional fields. Mandatory fields are indicated in red. The program is designed to allow the optional use of the JMP line number as a management tool. The use of the JMP line number allows the program to provide the aggregate costs associated with an individual assigned to an authorized position. This may be helpful when increases or decreases in the authorized manning or target levels of available funds require management decisions. The "function" criteria can be used to delineate the costs associated with a function, (e.g., training office). The program separates the budget data into direct charges, indirect charges, and special exhibits. The budget preparation module entails three distinct functions; set-up, budget data entry; and output preparation. Set-Up The set-up function allows the SAO to enter the constant data information for the:
Direct Charges Direct charges are those estimated costs for requirements for which the SAO will be authorized to obligate funds. They are normally categorized in the budget by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) object class. The data to develop the budget is entered by object class entry screens. The following section will list the separate entry screens and explain selected entries. Direct Charges T-20
Direct Charges -- Non-T-20. This function provides the SAO with the capability to enter other than T-20 program requirements. This function includes all of the separate object class areas that are in the Direct Charges T-20. Assistance-in-kind (AIK) will be entered in this functional area. Indirect Charges Indirect charges are used for those mission requirements like ICASS support, local guard services, and Coast Guard salary costs. The SAO directs the execution of these requirements, but does not receive obligational authority, since the bills are paid centrally by DSCA. ICASS The SAO will obtain the estimated bill for the ICASS charges the from local ICASS council and enter this amount in the data entry screen. Any clarifying remarks will also be added in the narrative field. Local Guard Services The amount of the SAO's share of the local residential guard services charges and an explanation for these charges will be entered in the narrative field. Special Exhibits Special Exhibits include areas of special interest to DSCA. These include C-12 Flying Hour Program, AIK, and unfunded requirements, estimated expenditures in foreign currency, and estimated funding requirements by quarter. C-12 Flying Hour Program This exhibit provides DSCA with information concerning the estimated SA mission flying hours being requested by the SAO. The cost per hour will be provided in the annual budget call. The required information is the number of trips, the total hours and the total cost. The narrative should be used to justify the hours. Foreign Currency This exhibit provides DSCA with information concerning the dollar amounts of SAO expenditures requiring conversion to the local currency. Identify actual and estimated local currency rates. Expenditures of less than $30,000.00 are exempt from this requirement. Severance Pay The SAARMS foreign service national (FSN) severance pay worksheet is used to identify potential FSN severance pay liabilities. The input in the SAARMS indirect cost table is calculated for each FSN but is put into the work sheet in total by FY. There are some exceptions to how FSN severance pay is budgeted for, if you have any questions contact your unified command. All other severance pay is accounted as an accrual under the benefits portion of civilian pay. SAO Workload Distribution By Functional Area Each SAO must analyze the current and projected workloads and submit a statement providing the estimated distribution of the SAO's activity as a percentage of total workload. The functional areas are:
Note.: The efforts of general support SAO personnel (e.g., administrative/clerical staff, supply, motor pool), and representational activity time should be distributed proportionately to each of the functional areas listed above in accordance with the relative percentage distribution of workload for operational personnel. This is necessary to ensure that an appropriate share of total SAO costs, including general support and representational activities, are properly allocated to both FMS administrative and FMF administrative funds. Appropriated FMF administrative funds are used to fund the non-FMS effort expended by the SAO, i.e., IMET, EUM, FY91 and prior MAP, other SA, and non-SA. Quarterly Funding The SAO will enter the dollar amount of funding authority estimated for each quarter based on requirements. The total will not exceed the target ceiling provided by the unified command. Any requirements below the funding line will be included in the unfunded requirements list. Unfunded Requirements The unified command will prepare a prioritized list of the unfunded requests from its SAOs. Each item approved by the unified command should be ranked in priority order) and should identify the applicable object class (or categorization of the costs by object class designations if more than one is relevant to the item). SAO Chief's Narrative This is the single most important part of the budget submission for both the T-20 and the O & M budgets. Clear, precise justification as to why the requested funding is required, to include the impact on the mission, any changes that have occurred or are pending that have caused the increase or decrease in the requirement.
SUMMARY
Preparation of the T-20 SAO operating budget requires the SAO to be familiar with the applicable budget formats and supplementary guidance from DSCA and the unified command. The SAO budget consists of data for four years, starting with the prior fiscal year and ending with the next budget year. |
|
CHAPTER 6 - International Cooperative Administrative Support Services
What is ICASS?
Goals:
You are the Key to Success
You are the Key to Success ICASS is a truly revolutionary way of doing business at our posts. To make it work will take the enthusiastic participation of everyone involved. Innovation, experimentation, and risk taking are encouraged at all levels. ICASS is an evolving system adaptable to local circumstances. The challenge of declining resources provides an opportunity, using ICASS, to eliminate waste, inefficiency and redundancy and to redefine priorities. Most importantly, ICASS allows you, the users, to have more control of administrative resources. Tools for Implementation The ICASS Handbook, 6 FAH-5-ICASS Handbook, provides the tools with which missions and agencies can implement ICASS. The handbook is revised periodically based on reader response and the continuing evolution of ICASS. It includes a listing of additional ICASS-related resources. ICASS has changed for the better the way administrative services are delivered for each mission. The Washington ICASS executive board, working group and service center work in concert to address policy issues so that missions have all the tools to move forward. Replacing the FAAS system, which required agencies to pay for overseas services from the State Department with little control over costs and quality of service, ICASS established locally empowered councils representing all agencies at post to manage and evaluate all services. Funding of local costs moved to post, and local managers retain savings as an incentive to develop cost savings initiatives. Focusing on the needs of the customer, the councils have clear cost reports to evaluate service alternatives (through comparison-shopping), and they share responsibility with the service provider for the most cost efficient and effective provision of interagency administrative service. The serviced agencies also have input into the evaluation of service providers. ICASS was developed in response to NPR initiatives that introduced an entrepreneurial spirit and teamwork to improve service in the field. The old system (FAAS) just was not up to the task -- -a system with the Department of State as sole service provider, charging for services through a complex and opaque arrangement where users had little effect on resource decisions. Thus, the old system is out, and ICASS, fully operational in FY98, was founded on the principles of local empowerment, equity, transparency, selection of service providers, and customer service standards and principles. Local Empowerment To effect "local empowerment", each mission has the following in place:
At larger posts, an "ICASS working group" should be formed as support for the council. The ICASS concept is centered on the principle of customer service. The Council must find ways to communicate with users at all levels to assure that customers are receiving the proper service. In Washington, the ICASS executive board, supported by the interagency working group, will continue to address unresolved policy issues and serve the field by considering thorny operational problems as they arise. The working capital fund, through which all ICASS funding flows, will improve flexibility to manage administrative support funds. All costs will be captured, recorded and clearly identified by service and agency, creating a transparent system. The WCF's no-year funding allows planning on a long-term basis and dispenses with wasteful year-end spending. Posts have more say in how business is done in the delivery of administrative services. Under ICASS, posts have more responsibility and authority to manage their resources. Each Mission has an ICASS Council made up of senior managers representing each agency at the post. SAO Chiefs may represent more than one DoD program, but will have separate agreements for each. Like a corporate board of directors, the Council is responsible for the overall management of shared administrative support activities, including the cost-effective use of resources, selection of service providers, establishment of customer service standards, and priorities within the administrative support delivery system. Local empowerment means delegation of the providers' personal services contracting (PSC) authority to the posts, the introduction of a local working capital fund so posts have more flexibility in using their resources, and putting in place a cost-distribution system to track true costs by service. Transparency Posts and headquarters can understand the basis for costs. All costs are clearly shown by agency for all post and non-post-related services, using an agreed-upon method. Budget and management information systems allow every post and agency to see and influence shared administrative costs, by service and by agency. Selection of Service Provider Posts choose who does what. Posts, through the councils, may look at other possibilities to get administrative support, consulting, and professional services in lieu of or in addition to those provided through the Department of State. Another agency at post might wish to provide a service for all participating agencies within the Mission, if it could do the job cheaper and more efficiently. Other choices to improve services or cut costs are commercial contractors, regionalization of support activities, the introduction of improved technology, and any other source that makes sense. Customer Service Standards and Principles Users have say in what they want and what they get. Customer service is a key element of ICASS. Looking at the needs of the post and the resources, the Council will establish standards for administrative services and evaluate the performance of the service provider in meeting them. The agencies at posts, which are the customers, hold the service providers accountable for their performance and, through the Council, seek ways to improve services and reduce costs. Local Council Precepts
Summary
ICASS provides a viable method of providing administrative services at a Post. The SAO Chief has a very important role as a member of the local council. |
|
CHAPTER 7 - Security Assistance Automated Resource Management Suite
Purpose
This chapter provides a brief history and systems description of Security Assistance Automated Resource Management Suite (SAARMS). As the modules for this system are developed, each will have its own software user's handbook.
Background
In August 1991, Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) adopted an automated software program that was developed by Headquarters, USCENTCOM, for the security assistance offices (SAOs') automated memorandum accounting and budget execution requirements as the standard software for worldwide use. In the process, allowance was made for other unified commands' unique requirements. This product, titled the SAARMS Budget Execution Module, has been distributed to all unified commands and SAOs, and these organizations have received training on its use. Since the adoption of the SAARMS Budget Execution program, the security assistance network (SAN) policy steering board has approved the development of integrated modules for budget preparation, and property management. Requirements for reports and data consolidation at the unified command, DFAS-AYADS/DE, and DSCA have been included in each of the modules as required. Each of these modules is discussed below. With the adoption of the SAARMS budget execution module as the standard system for the SAO feeder accounting system, in FY86 Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) directed that T-20 funds would be allocated directly to the unified commands for further distribution to the SAOs. The accounting procedures would follow the DFAS-DE memorandums, and the unified commands and SAOs were no longer required to use the service regulations and systems for T-20 funds management.
Budget Execution Module
The budget execution module automates the manual record keeping of the daily SAO budget execution functions. This module includes the following features:
The budget execution module uses Microsoft Access as the software platform, as a stand-alone "run-time" system for a personal computer (PC) in each SAO. The transfer of data and reports is accomplished electronically using the Integrated Security Assistance Automated Resource Management System (ISAARMS) contained within the SAN WEB. ISAARMS is the primary method to upload the SAO end-of-the-month reports to DFAS-AYADS/DE. Alternate electronic capability incorporates the features of the MS Office software programs and E-mail to forward reports to the unified command and DFAS-AYADS/DE. As a last resort the reports can be generated and transmitted using the fax as required. Budget Preparation Module The budget preparation module standardizes the SAO budget submission. The budget preparation module uses MS Access as the software platform, in a "run-time' version as a stand-alone system for a PC in each SAO, unlike most budget preparation programs, manual or automated, this module allows the SAO to use the "zero-based" budgeting concept. The module uses the concept of entering the requirements by object class (direct funded) and Indirect funded (those requirements that are directed by the SAO, but centrally paid by DSCA). It generates the required reports and provides automated mathematical calculations. The data files can be transmitted to the unified command electronically by file transfer with e-mail or by mailing a "floppy disk". The unified command can consolidate the separate SAO requirements and make adjustments as required before forwarding the data to DSCA. DSCA consolidates the data into a single worldwide file for use as required. Future enhancements are planned to include an automated interface with the data generated by the budget execution module, the property module, and previous budget submissions. Although the budget development process will be less labor intensive as a result of the automation, the SAO Chief must still review the proposed budget prior to submission to the unified command to accommodate anticipated changes in resource requirements. Property Module The property module is used worldwide by many SAOs. It uses MS Access as the software platform, as a stand-alone "run-time" version for a PC in each SAO. It provides a system for the SAO to manage equipment and other controlled property. It was developed initially by the SAO in Bonn, Germany, and then further enhanced by Headquarters, EUCOM. It is now managed by DISAM. It used the Army property management concepts to provide the SAO an automated means of managing authorized property. This module includes:
Maintenance of SAARMS Since SAARMS version 1.0 was fielded in 1991, several major enhancements have been included. Over the years the software has become relatively "stable," in that all major requirements are already included. Users are highly encouraged to recommend changes to the software and to submit them to the unified command, who will in turn refer them to DSCA. DSCA/Compt//RM who will review the requirements with the DISAM to the development team and develop priorities. Additionally, new requirements are solicited at annual unified command budget. Formal surveys of participants and private discussions are the vessel used to garner these inputs. Once inputs are received, DSCA/Compt/RM and the SAARMS team discuss the recommendations, determine the validity of each, and develop a timeline for completion of each task. DSCA/Compt/RM assigns a priority and coordinates with the unified commands before programming the changes begins. Testing New versions of the SAARMS software are tested in four ways.
Implementation SAOs should install the software on receipt and start using it. When a new version of SAARMS is distributed, one of the key advantages is that all previously reported "bugs" should have been fixed, and additional enhancements have been added. By implementing the software upon receipt, SAOs can usually reduce the number of errors incurred while using the software and improve office efficiency. Training Training on the software is conducted in several different ways.
User Manuals These manuals provide information on how to install and use the software. Additionally, they explain the interfaces between other systems, such as the SAN, ISAARMS and SAARMS. The manual is designed to be completely comprehensive in nature including screen shots of SAARMS and appendixes explaining the codes used. Software and Hardware Generally, upgrades to run the SAARMS software worldwide are not required, as the modules are distributed in a run-time format. There are some super users who try to generate their own reports and forms, but they often must purchase updated software (i.e., MS Access 2000) using local unit funds. DISAM does not provide for comprehensive purchase of software. Hardware upgrades, although not required in most cases, are certainly desired. The SAARMS software will run on older machines, but there is a definite reduction in efficiency and effectiveness when using an older computer. Generally, replacement computers should be purchased on a three-year cycle to ensure that each SAO is up to speed with enhanced software requirements.
SUMMARY
The SAARMS software modules developed or under development provide standard procedures and information reporting for SAOs worldwide. The maximum use of electronic reporting is being continually incorporated in all modules to reduce the need to mail or fax information. The software has been designed to reduce the duplicative data entry and manual calculations to reduce the probability of error. |
|
CHAPTER 8 - Internal Management Controls
Purpose
This chapter highlights the role and importance of Internal Management Controls (IMC) Program at the Security Assistance Office (SAO) level. The Federal Manager's Integrity Act of 1982 requires federal agencies to establish an IMC system. The Department of Defense (DoD) has implemented the IMC Program through DoD Directive 5010.38, and the unified command may promulgate further IMC regulations. Rationale and Scope The basic tenet of the IMC Program is to have controls that prevent fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. These controls must be in place and working as an integral part of the daily operating procedures. Supervisors at all levels must be personally involved in the establishment, operation and review of internal controls. The IMC control systems must provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the systems will be accomplished. Moreover, the cost of administering the program should not exceed the benefits anticipated. The internal control structure is subject to inherent limitations, especially in small SAOs. Segregation of duties and management supervision is compounded in these SAOs because of the limited number of personnel and the requirements to perform mission requirements when members are absent for valid reasons.
Standards As a minimum, the program, as it relates to the SAO budget area, should include the following standards:
Moreover, this control further implies independent checks of records and reports. Simply stated, the initiator of a record should not be the reviewer of a record. The SAO fiscal officer should check the records of the SAO fiscal clerk, and the SAO chief should periodically check the work of both. Starting with the SAO Chief, periodic management reviews should be conducted to ensure compliance with established procedures. Moreover, the unified command is responsible for conducting management reviews as part of the ongoing inspection/assistance schedule. Role of the SAO The IMC process involves the commitment of all SAO personnel. The SAO chief performs the informal local risk assessment for each assessable unit. The SAO chief uses the Assessable Unit Listing to review the implementation and adequacy of the SAO's IMC program. This is required each September. The SAO chief reports once a year on the IMC program status to the unified command. The unified command must report annually to the Secretary of Defense on the IMC status within his command. The SAO POC has the following responsibilities: document the program; teach assigned and attached personnel about the program; ensure internal control reviews or alternative internal control reviews are conducted; and document performance of alternative internal control reviews. Other SAO members and attached personnel implement the internal control program in the day-to-day procedures.
Summary
In compliance with statutory and DoD regulatory requirements, all SAOs must have an IMC Program. Proper understanding and implementation of the program will ensure better management and may prevent a unit from getting into serious trouble, due to the lack of such oversight. |
|
APPENDIX A - Abbreviations (Brevity Codes) and Acronyms (Pneumonias)
|
|
APPENDIX B - Glossary of Terms
|
|
APPENDIX C - References
|
|
APPENDIX D - Object Class Definitions Reference: OMB Circular A-11, Section 35.4, Subject as above. The terms used in the object classification are defined as follows: PERSONAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS - (Object classes 11.1 through 13.0)
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AND SUPPLIES - (Object classes 21.0 through 26.0)
ACQUISITION OF CAPITAL ASSETS - (Object classes 31.0 through 33.0)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||