| |
Funding Source
(Total value for services, includes per diem, salary, travel)
|
|
Row #
|
Core Function(s)
|
Program Element(s)
|
Activities
|
FMS Admin
(Standard Level of Service)
|
FMS Case
|
|
1
|
Pre-Letter of Request (LOR)
|
1, 4
|
Pre-LOR work to support a specific potential FMS program. This includes, but is not limited to, efforts to:
-
Identify defense requirements
-
Provide system and platform information
-
Equipment demonstrations
-
Partner with industry on potential FMS programs
-
Respond to requests [e.g. Requests for Proposal (RFPs)] regarding international competitions with an FMS component
|
X
|
If the Pre-LOR work in Row #1 exceeds ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater) and an FMS case results from this activity, then the FMS case refunds the FMS Admin budget from a services line on that case.
If no FMS case results from this activity, the FMS Admin budget will not receive a refund.
|
|
2
|
Pre-Letter of Request (LOR)
|
1, 4
|
Site surveys, logistics support conferences, case planning meetings, etc., necessary to delineate/definitize purchaser requirements prior to a request for an Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA).
|
If the Pre-LOR work in Row #2 is not expected to exceed ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater), the costs of these activities may initially be funded with FMS Admin funds. If an FMS case results from this activity, then the FMS case refunds the FMS Admin budget from a services line on that case.
If no FMS case results from this activity, the FMS Admin budget will not receive a refund.
|
If the Pre-LOR work in Row #2 is expected to exceed ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater), an FMS case MUST be written or an existing case amended to cover costs of these activities PRIOR to performing the services (rather than funding initially from FMS Admin).
|
|
3
|
Case Development
|
10
|
Responses to requests for information from foreign countries prior to an LOA.
|
X
|
If the responses require preparation of reports or other documentation; travel to meetings; etc. that are expected to exceed ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater), this work must be charged to the customer as a services line on an FMS case.
|
|
4
|
Case Development
|
10
|
Preparation of Price and Availability (P&A) Data.
|
X
|
P&A data are Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM). If the response requires preparation of reports or other documentation; travel to meetings; etc. then it does not qualify as ROM data. If more than ROM data is required, an LOA should be prepared---see Row #5.
If the purchaser requests multiple iterations of a specific request for P&A (ROM) data and work to prepare these additional responses is expected to exceed ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater), this work must be charged to the customer as a services line on an FMS case. This includes requests for multiple iterations based on different quantities, condition, inclusion/exclusion of specified costs, etc.
|
|
5
|
Case Development
|
10
|
Development and preparation of LOA documents to include LOAs, Amendments, Modifications, Letters of Intent (LOIs). This includes, but is not limited to:
-
Development of LOA pricing data and notes;
-
Entry of case information into the Defense Security Assistance Management System (DSAMS);
-
Coordination of documents;
-
Quality control to ensure legal, financial, and policy compliance;
-
Participation in case-writing related meetings;
-
Preparation of LOA document package information to include:
-
Manpower and Travel Data Sheet
-
Financial Analysis Worksheet (SDAF only)
-
MTCR review results
-
Review of waiver information
-
Checklists;
-
Working with the purchaser to ensure document meets requirements - to include providing DSAMS reports, Manpower Travel and Data Sheet (MTDS) as needed.
|
FMS Admin-funded for a single preparation of the LOA document.
If purchaser requests are made for multiple versions of the same document (e.g., "what if"-type drills), the response should be in the form of P&A data rather than a formal document.
|
If the purchaser requests multiple LOA, Amendment, or Modification versions, and work to prepare these additional responses is expected to exceed ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater), this work must be charged to the customer as a services line on an FMS case (Either the proposed new FMS case if the LOA document is accepted; or an existing FMS case if the proposed new FMS case is not accepted. Request assistance from DSCA if unable to determine which FMS case should be charged). This includes requests for multiple iterations based on different quantities, condition, inclusion/exclusion of specified costs, etc.
|
|
6
|
Case Development
|
10
|
Development of Not-to-Exceed (NTE) LOAs.
|
|
Services line on the NTE FMS case to cover "incremental costs" incurred or expected to be incurred based on the purchaser's request to prepare the LOA using NTE pricing. "Incremental costs" are those costs to cover any work beyond preparation of a case written using current policies and pricing guidelines. [Reference: DSCA memo I 00/006952 dated June 15, 2000.]
|
|
7
|
Case Development
|
10
|
Development of an LOA that is "classified" at the request of the purchaser.
|
See paragraphs C4.5.16. and C5.4.11. for restrictions on classifying LOAs. Development of "classified" LOAs may be Admin-funded if the additional work required does not exceed ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater).
|
If work to prepare this "classified" LOA is expected to exceed ¼ work-year or $25,000 (whichever is greater), a services line on the "classified" case must be used to cover additional costs incurred or expected to be incurred with preparation and handling outside the DSAMS document preparation capabilities.
|
|
8
|
Case Development
|
10
|
Processing case-related waivers to USG policies and procedures (e.g., nonrecurring cost waivers)
[Note: This activity covers the "processing" of these waivers - "developing" nonrecurring cost estimates is not an FMS Admin-funded activity.]
|
X
|
|
|
9
|
Case Development
|
8
|
Determine releasability and disclosure decisions for requested articles and services.
|
Releasability and disclosure activities are not funded by FMS Admin or the FMS case. These activities are funded using Implementing Agency Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funds.
|
|
10
|
Case Development
|
12
|
Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) review of FMS case for compliance.
|
MTCR activities are not funded by FMS Admin or the FMS case. These activities are funded using Implementing Agency O&M funds.
|
|
11
|
Case Development
|
12
|
Case implementation
|
X
|
|
|
12
|
Case Execution and Case Closure
|
13, 14, 15, 16, 19
|
Efforts/services required to execute the case to include, but not limited to:
-
Establish cost, schedule, and performance goals and objectives for execution of the case;
-
Monitor and manage case performance from cradle-to-grave including: scope, schedule of work, cost, payment schedules, problem resolution, financial services, etc.;
-
Conduct USG-internal meetings needed to perform execution activities;
-
Inform purchaser regarding case execution status. See other entries in this matrix for more information on proper source of funding for case review-related meetings;
-
Pull and/or prepare reports needed to monitor case execution status and keep purchaser informed [NOTE: See Row #15 for additional information on reports from the Security Cooperation Information Portal (SCIP)];
-
Initiate, oversee and manage the acquisition process to include processing of Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (MIPRs) between agencies;
-
Prepare and process requisitions to include providing appropriate status and tracking/coordination/ problem-solving efforts normally performed by DoD Supply and Inventory Control Points, and International Logistics Control Office to ensure on-time deliveries;
-
Report deliveries, to include both the physical (constructive) delivery of the article/service and the associated financial/billing transactions;
-
Maintain case files;
-
Conduct annual case reviews (in accordance with this manual and the Reconciliation and Closure Manual (RCM))
[NOTE: See Rows #18 - #22 for additional information on case reviews.]
-
Perform reconciliation of financial and logistical management systems until the case is supply/services complete;
-
Process Supply Discrepancy Reports (SDRs). This includes "processing" only and does not include payment of any approved refund or restitution. See SAMM Table C6.T5. for information regarding proper source of funds for payments associated with approved SDRs;
-
Perform case closure activities (to include reconciliation efforts for supply/service complete cases) to include all types of closure.
|
X
|
|
|
13
|
Case Execution and Case Closure
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Execution support beyond that provided as part of Row #12. This support may cover additional acquisition support, dedicated requisition processing, program acceleration (excluding incentive clauses in contracts), expedited closure, etc. This support may be required either:
-
By the USG based on analysis of the requirements
(For example: Some weapon systems may require more extensive management from a USG-perspective if they are complex, being newly introduced to a country's inventory, etc.)
-
By the purchaser request for additional support
(For example: Some cases may require more extensive management or expedited closure from a purchaser-perspective if they have high visibility within the country or if there are internal country requirements for reporting, tracking, etc.)
|
|
Incremental costs above the Standard Level of Service provided in Row #12. LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
|
|
14
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Efforts/services required to execute a case that is "classified" at the request of the purchaser (i.e., would not be otherwise classified by the USG).
|
See paragraphs C4.5.16. and C5.4.11. for restrictions on classifying LOAs.
|
Services line on the "classified" case to cover all additional costs incurred or expected to be incurred with execution outside normal domestic systems and processes (often manual).
|
|
15
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Retrieval of reports and data available from the SCIP.
|
|
Retrieving data from SCIP is not part of the Standard Level of Service provided under the FMS Admin surcharge since the FMS purchaser can pull this data. If the FMS purchaser requests that USG personnel provide data readily available in SCIP, this should be considered a service and included on an FMS case.
|
|
16
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Preparation of reports as requested by the purchaser that are either: (1) more detailed reporting than covered under Row #12; and/or (2) more frequent reporting than covered under Row #12.
|
|
Incremental costs above the Standard Level of Service provided in Row #12. LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
|
|
17
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Security Assistance accounting and budgeting (to include Defense Accounting and Financial Services (DFAS)).
|
X
|
Incremental costs above the Standard Level of Service provided in Row #12.
LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
|
|
18
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Review [Case-Level]
Review the individual FMS case (monitoring acquisition and training, tracking requisitions, reviewing financial status, etc.) continuously throughout the life of the case. Conduct meetings and/or prepare correspondence as determined by the USG to keep the case on-track and keep the purchaser informed regarding cost, schedule, and performance of the individual case. The case manager will decide if the case warrants face-to-face meetings to conduct this review or if other means of communication will suffice. Most aspects of case reviews are automated and do not require formal face-to-face reviews, particularly when the case's cost, schedule, and performance are on-track. The purchaser should be encouraged to utilize the SCIP for day-to-day information on one or more specific case(s). Face-to-face or formal meetings to review a specific case should be rare and considered only when significant issues impact cost, schedule, or performance of the case. Each FMS case must include a note that states the number and type of reviews provided as part of the Standard Level of Service for that case. This note must be updated during the life of the FMS case as required based on changes in the program.
|
X
|
|
|
19
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Review [Case-Level (Beyond Row #18)]
Case-Level Review support beyond that provided as part of Row #18. This support may cover additional reviews needed to keep the individual FMS case on-track and keep the purchaser informed regarding cost, schedule, and performance and may be required either:
-
By the USG based on analysis of the requirements
(For example: USG may determine that the case needs to be reviewed more frequently than Row #18, based on unique aspects of the program that depend on frequent updates)
-
By the purchaser request for specific additional review
(For example: The purchaser may request that case-level, face-to-face reviews be conducted more frequently than provided in Row #18)
|
|
Incremental costs above the Standard Level of Service provided in Row #18. LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
[NOTE: This also includes travel and personnel costs when a customer requires specific USG organizational attendance at any meetings above that required by the case manager.]
|
|
20
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Review [Program-Level]
Review specific FMS program (e.g., major weapon system acquisition that may consist of multiple cases) for a purchaser. Conduct meetings and/or prepare correspondence as needed to keep the program on-track and keep the purchaser informed regarding issues impacting the overall program (acquisition and training; deliveries; financial status; cost, schedule, and performance; etc.). Frequency should be consistent with the milestone plan established during case development. These reviews may be required either:
-
By the USG based on analysis of the requirements, or
-
By the purchaser request for specific additional support
If this level review is USG-mandated, the case manager will decide (1) how frequently this review is required, and (2) if the program warrants face-to-face meetings to conduct this review or if other means of communication will suffice. If the program involves multiple cases with different case managers, these decisions will be made jointly based on analysis of the requirements.
|
|
This review may overlap some aspects of the Case-Level Review provided in Row #18. If so, incremental costs above the Standard Level of Service provided in Row #18 to perform the Program-Level Review must be case-funded. If there is no overlap between these 2 types of review, all costs for the Program-Level Review must be case-funded. LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
These services may be included on the major acquisition case or spread throughout the individual cases that support the program.
|
|
21
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Review [Implementing Agency-Level]
Review all purchaser cases managed by an individual Implementing Agency. Conduct meetings and/or prepare correspondence as needed to keep the cases on-track and keep the purchaser informed regarding issues impacting their overall program with that Implementing Agency (acquisition and training; deliveries; financial status; cost, schedule, and performance; etc.). Required either:
-
By the USG based on analysis of the requirements, or
-
By the purchaser request for specific additional support
If this level review is USG-mandated, the Implementing Agency determines if the standard Case-Level Review requirements provided in Row #18 are more efficiently met by conducting an overall review that includes all the purchaser's cases with that Implementing Agency.
|
FMS Admin-funded if not specifically requested by the purchaser and the USG determines this is the most efficient method of providing the services identified in Row #18.
|
FMS case-funded if specifically requested by the purchaser and not determined by the USG as the most efficient method of providing the services identified in Row #18. This review may overlap some aspects of the Case-Level Review provided in Row #18. If so, incremental costs above the Standard Level of Service provided in Row #18 to perform the Implementing Agency-Level Review must be case-funded. If there is no overlap between these 2 types of review, all costs for the Implementing Agency-Level Review must be case-funded. LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
Purchaser-requested reviews of this nature should be conducted under an LOA line item expressly for this purpose.
|
|
22
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15, 16
|
Review [Country-Level]
Review country's entire FMS program. Conduct meetings and/or prepare correspondence as needed to keep the country's overall FMS program on-track and keep the purchaser informed regarding issues impacting the overall program (acquisition and training; deliveries; financial status; cost, schedule, and performance; etc.). Required either:
-
By the USG based on analysis of the requirements, or
-
By the purchaser request for specific additional support
If this level review is USG-mandated, DSCA will decide (1) how frequently this review is required, and (2) if the overall program warrants face-to-face meetings to conduct this review or if other means of communication will suffice. This includes Financial Management Reviews (FMRs).
|
FMS Admin-funded if not specifically requested by the purchaser and the USG determines this is the most efficient method of providing the services identified in Row #18.
|
FMS case-funded if specifically requested by the purchaser and not determined by the USG as the most efficient method of providing the services identified in Row #18. This review may overlap some aspects of the Case-Level Review provided in Row #18. If so, incremental costs above the Standard Level of Service provided in Row #18 to perform the Country-Level Review must be case-funded. If there is no overlap between these 2 types of review, all costs for the Country-Level Review must be case-funded. LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
These services may be included on any case designated by the purchaser or may be spread throughout multiple cases.
|
|
23
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
Services such as: studies and surveys; technical assistance; etc. to include, but not limited to, advisory personnel or members of Mobile Training Teams (MTTs); Technical Assistance Field Teams (TAFTs); Contractor Engineering Technical Services (CETS); program task forces; Technical Assistance Teams (TATs); Quality Assurance Teams (QATs); Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) etc. Required either:
-
By the USG based on analysis of the requirements, or
-
By the purchaser request for specific additional support
|
|
X
|
|
24
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
Services provided as a membership in a USG sponsored group such as Technical Coordination Groups (TCG), International Engine Management Program (IEMP), Electronic Combat International Security Assistance Program (ECISAP), Fair Share Sustainment Program (FSSP), Engineering Fair Share Program (ESSP), Apache Coordination Technical Services Improvement Program (ACTSIP), etc.
|
|
X
|
|
25
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
Services required to produce materiel requested by the purchaser (i.e., engineering services, testing).
|
|
The organic costs incurred are included in the materiel line.
|
|
26
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
Services such as: Configuration management, Weapon systems management, Systems integration, and Integrated logistics/training management. Required either:
-
By the USG based on analysis of the requirements, or
-
By the purchaser request for specific additional support
|
|
X
|
|
27
|
Case Execution
|
|
Transportation, lodging, per diem, or other administrative expenses of foreign Government representatives, even though such expenses may relate to the materiel and/or services being provided on the case.
|
These services will not be included on FMS cases nor be paid for using Administrative Surcharge funds. Foreign purchasers are responsible for making and paying for these arrangements outside the FMS process.
|
|
28
|
Business Sustainment
|
22
|
Space rental and/or refurbishment charges specifically incurred to support the FMS "community" mission.
|
X
|
|
|
29
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
Space rental and/or refurbishment charges specifically incurred to support the purchaser/case (e.g., warehousing).
|
|
Incremental costs above the standard level of service provided in Row #28. LOA notes must clearly define for each of these line items exactly what support beyond the Standard Level of Service is required.
|
|
30
|
Business Sustainment
|
26
|
Information Technology (IT) services/equipment specifically incurred to support the FMS "community" mission. For dedicated FMS organizations, this includes all IT costs. For non-dedicated organizations, this includes only those incremental IT costs that are attributable to FMS mission performance.
|
X
|
|
|
31
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
IT services/equipment specifically incurred to support the purchaser/case.
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
Business Sustainment
|
22
|
Supplies and equipment specifically incurred to support the FMS "community" mission. For dedicated FMS organizations (e.g., AFSAC, USASAC, NAVICP-OF), this includes all supply and equipment costs. For non-dedicated organizations, this includes only those supplies and equipment that are attributable to FMS work-years.
|
X
|
|
|
33
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
Supplies and equipment specifically incurred to support the purchaser/case.
|
|
X
|
|
34
|
Business Sustainment
|
20
|
Job-related skills training (not specifically related to an FMS case) for individuals who spend 50% or more of their time performing FMS-related work.
|
X
|
|
|
35
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
Job-related skills training specifically related to an FMS case (does not include certification requirements --- see Row #37). For example: Defensive Driving Course for team members being deployed to a high terrorist threat country
|
|
X
|
|
36
|
Business Sustainment
|
22
|
Job-related skills training for individuals who spend less than 50% of their time performing FMS-related work
|
These training activities are not funded by FMS Admin or the case. These training activities are funded by the same source that pays the employee's salary.
|
|
37
|
Business Sustainment
|
22
|
Training for certified personnel for their continued education required to maintain their certification.
|
These training activities are normally funded using funds other than FMS Admin or the FMS case. If a certification is required for a position to support an FMS case, a qualified (i.e., certified) person should be selected. Any questions about whether or not training should be Admin-funded should be directed to DSCA (Business Operations Directorate).
|
|
38
|
Business Sustainment
|
22
|
Training for TAFTs or MTTs and other personnel for their direct support to a case (does not include certification requirements --- see Row #37).
|
|
X
|
|
39
|
Case Execution
|
13, 14, 15
|
DoD MILDEP training exercises in support of an FMS case exercise.
|
|
X
|
|
40
|
Business Sustainment
|
22
|
Language Training
|
Language training is not funded by either FMS Admin or the FMS case. If a language skill is required on the case, a qualified person (e.g., someone already proficient in the language to the extent required) should be selected.
|
-
The Core Functions and Program Elements listed above are used by the USG security cooperation community for tracking and recording costs. They are included here for information purposes only.
-
Salaries of US Military personnel (not including Coast Guard) are paid for by MILPERS funds when these personnel are performing activities included in the "FMS Admin" column. When activities in the "FMS Case" column are performed by US military personnel, the salaries of these personnel should be reimbursed by the FMS case unless the case is fully funded with FMF Non-Repayable, Military Assistance Program (MAP) funds, or other USG appropriations.
-
When activities in the "FMS Case" column are performed by US civilian personnel, unfunded civilian retirement costs should be included in the pricing except when the case is funded using other USG appropriations. [Note: This exception does not include FMF and MAP.]
-
Overtime, awards, or similar personnel actions are funded by the same source that pays the employee's salary if the employee is full-time, dedicated to that source.
-
Definitions of "incremental": Efforts/costs expended beyond the Standard Level of Service. Only the difference in costs between these efforts and the Standard Level of Service would be charged to the case.
-
¼ work-year equates to 520 hours of a 2080 hour work-year. This and the $25,000 threshold are not per person - these limits apply to all cumulative work of anyone working on that particular project/program. When adding costs to determine if the $25,000 threshold has been met, use DoD 7000.14-R, (reference (o)), Volume 15, Chapter 7.
-
FMS case funds are not the source of funding for any activity after the case closes.
|